Harry Potter & a Prisoner of Azkaban (2004) is the third in the Harry Potter film series and was directed by Alfonso Cuarón. It stars a actors from either a past films in the series, except for the role of Albus Dumbledore, which saw Michael Gambon taking over from either a late Richard Harris. Very much of the original crew as well returned, including screenwriter Steve Kloves.

Tagline: Something Wicked This Way Comes.

Synopsis
For the brief abstract watch Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, ''for a complete outline understand the extended plot wikibook

The mysterious convict, Sirius Black, escapes from Azkaban and sets his sights on Hogwarts, where dementors are stationed to protect Harry and his peers.

Cast
|- bgcolor="#CCCCCC" ! Role !! Actor |- ! Harry Potter | Daniel Radcliffe |- ! Ron Weasley | Rupert Grint |- ! Hermione Granger | Emma Watson |- ! Sirius Black | Gary Oldman |- ! Professor Lupin | David Thewlis |- ! Professor Snape | Alan Rickman |- ! Professor Dumbledore | Michael Gambon |- ! Rubeus Hagrid | Robbie Coltrane |- ! Draco Malfoy | Tom Felton |- ! Professor Trelawney | Emma Thompson |- ! Professor McGonagall | Maggie Smith |- ! Aunt Marge | Pam Ferris |- ! Uncle Vernon | Richard Griffiths |- ! Aunt Petunia | Fiona Shaw |- ! Dudley Dursley | Harry Melling |- ! Peter Pettigrew | Timothy Spall |- ! Cornelius Fudge | Robert Hardy |}

Locations
A select few of the sets for the film were built within Glen Coe, Scotland, near to the Clachaig Inn. A indoor sets, including sets built for the former 2 films, come within the main in Leavesden Film Studios. A Hogwarts flow of any stream was filmed from either Loch Shiel in the Upland of Scotland. Incidentally, a train bridge which was as well featured in the Chamber of Secrets picture is paired Loch Shiel and was used to film a sequences whilst a Dementor arrived on the train.

Trivia
Musician Ian Brown makes a cameo appearance as a wizard in The Leaky Cauldron reading A Brief History of Time. A score was composed and conducted by John Williams and released in Video in May 25, 2004. The placed of Honeydukes seen in this film occurs as redress of the set of Flourish and Blotts seen in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets'', which, in turn, was the damages of the placed of Ollivander's from the first film. This means a equivalent placed was utilized altogether leash films, however it was utilized as a different location inside every. A film broke many opening records about a world upon its release, including the top grossing film inside UK film history, & mass produced more or less $US 35.1m in its 1st Three years, totalling $US 158.1m within decade years. When of September 28, the film got grossed $US 785m worldwide. In the Netherlands the film was given a favorite rating of Nina from carolina. Occasionally humans in a U.s. can believe A OFLC (Professional of Film & Literature Classification, Australia) was correct to rate this flick M (The same to the MPAA's PG-13 classificatiin) ab initio, however a rating was lowered to PG on appeal. David Thewlis, who plays Professor Lupin, was an original choice to play Professor Quirrell in ''Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone''.

Deviations from the book
The backstory involving Moony, Wormtail, Padfoot and Prongs is non explained, though hinted throughout a picture. There are no firm explanation is given when to how come Snape hates each Sirius & Lupine such. James Potter is never disclosed to use at times get an animagus. Harry receives his Firebolt at a prevent of his third month like than at Christmas. A choir of Hogwarts students is added, singing "Double, double, toil and trouble... Something wicked this way comes." The dementors float and fly like than glide. A shrunken head, voiced by Lenny Henry, is added to the Knight Bus as, according to Cuarón, the "wizarding equivalent to radio" Even though the wizarding same to the radio occurs as wireless which is good rather a radio upright using wizarding stations. Harry is caught by having a Marauder's Map by Snape while wandering around at night trying to find Peter Pettigrew rather than after visiting Hogsmeade a second time. Malfoy mistook Harry as a ghost of the Shrieking Shack. In the book, Harry was caught by Malfoy using the invisibleness cloak once his head had revealed inadvertently. Harry (& a audience) acquire their number one indication that Peter Pettigrew can be alive after Harry understands his title on the map, like than in the Shrieking Shack scene. "Moony" is spelled "Mooney" as an inside-joke on to Karl Mooney, one of the ocular results supervisors. In the DVD subtitles, it is spelled "Moony" when it was in the book. The Quidditch Ventral suction cup is left retired altogether. Merely a share of a single Quidditch game is shown, so a partly where Malfoy & his crew dress higher when Dementors was as well omitted. Romantic tension between Ron Weasley & Hermione Granger is implied. J. K. Rowling approved of this. A close relationship is implied between Remus Lupin & Harry's mother, Lily Potter. There has been good deal debate assibilate whether the director even meant to to indicate the romantic retiring between them characters or just a deep friendly relationship. Ron confronts a boggart spider by yielding it roller skates like than removing its legs. A boggarts of more characters were changed too. For instance, Parvati Patil's boggart is the snake in the film, whereas it was a mummy in the book. Snape (world health organization was attend bring Lupine his Wolfsbane Potion) found him running for the Whomping Willow. He utilized Harry's Invisibility Cloak to watch Lupine in the book however wasn't wearing it in the film. While in the Shrieking Shack, merely Harry attacks & knocks out Snape, when opposed to Harry, Ron, & Hermione together. This experienced the bizzare symptom of giving a Expeliarmus charm super random--another time everthing it did was knock a wand away from mortal's hand however on this text it bolwed Snape correct complete. Ron's line in the book "If you want to kill Harry, you'll have to kill us too!" is given to Hermione. Professor Trelawney is depicted as an eccentric & pollyannaish lunatic, non as a mysterious, single, flake. All of Prof Trelawney's predictions except a ones all about Harry's dying & Voldemort giving come left retired. Besides, a prediction all about Harry's dying is merely mentioned inside of these scene of the film. In a film, a present-period Harry actually witnesses a material stag Patronus cast by his future self. In the book, he lives out 1st. Professional people potty watch a material Patronus from future Harry's perspective if you look closely at Harry's wand. In a film, whilst Lupine is teaching Harry training perform a Patronus Charm, a happy memory that eventually allows Harry to exist as successful is Harry "just talking" by using his parents; in a book a memory is of Hagrid telling him he is allowing the Dursley's to attend Hogwarts. In the book, Hermione had a little mental breakdown due to the fullness of her schedule and complexness of time travel. In the film, this was replaced by the running gag, where Hermione appears apparently away from nowhere to which Ron exclaims "Where did she come from?!" Originally Harry spent fortnight at London & bought completely his books by himself except for Monster Book of Monsters which was his birthday present by Hagrid. In a book Mr. Weasley didn't tell Harry just about Sirius. Instead Harry heard that inadvertently, after he was attend choose back Scabbers' rat tonic from either a bar. In a film you didn't look at how else Hermione bought Crookshanks, likewise i personally tend there is no clues of unknown behaviour of Scabbers. Sir Cadogan was cut from either a film, although i might understand him within deleted scenes in DVD. Episode whenever Sirius sneaked into Gryffindor son's dormitories was omitted, though cases which happened after were present inside deleted scene in DVD. In a flick i have there is no clues how else Sirius shake off Azkaban. In a book after Harry was caught by using a Vulture's Map by Snape, Lupine was known as utilizing open fireplace (Floo powder network). In a book Harry practised Patronus Charms inside the classroom of History of Magic non in uranology tower. Buckbeack got the series of lawsuits & appeals that occurred throughout virtually all of the season, non upright 1 when tacit in the film. Likewise, there are no mentiin of Hermione portion Hagrid develop appears on film. Harry heard that Sirius was his Godfather around a few personal room of Madam Rosmerta withwithin 3 Broom handle, when in book he was upright concealment under a table in the bar. around picture Harry ran away dismayed while he heard that Sirius is his Godfather; in book Ron & Hermione upright browsed at Harry below a table, misused for words. around film Harry threw snowballs at Malfoy when it were touching Shrieking Shack, in the book this scene happened in spring, Hermione wasn't using the children & Harry threw mud, non snowballs. In the film, a presence of Dementors is shown to instantly ice up a encompassing environment; in the books, it were but described equally surrounded by a chill. In a moving picture Harry didn't reply Sirius whether he wanted to accept him, in a book he replied positively, saying he may not miss a risk to move out from either the Dursleys' home. In a book Lupine didn't allow Harry to face a boggart. In a book, Lupine's Boggart turned into the roach when his Riddikulus spell. Too, it originally took the picturesque form of the super conspicuous good moon (complete using clouds) wherewhen in the book it was described as existence a "shiny orb," or less apparently a moon. The film shows an Western-style werewolf (bipedal, highly big) whereas in a books, Lupine becomes the normal wolf (wolfman & wolves about monovular based on data from of these Defence Against the Dark Arts text edition) albeit an outstandingly vicious 1. around a book, after Sirius is captured at a prevent, he is locked in Prof Flitwick's professional & them keep around to dislodge a window (via magic). a film has Sirius barred inside the dungeon inside a high tower & Hermione blasts the door murder. In a book, these are explained that Sirius was supposed to become a Ceramicist's "Secret Keeper" & so he would keep around been a exclusively of these world health organization stand told Voldemort their location. This is the cause how come everyone and then strongly assumed his guilt. At a previous moment, all a same, he gave a project to Peter Pettigrew & lone he & the Ceramicist knew all about it. This is cut all from either a film. No explanation when to how else Black knows within which can i buy Pettigrew occurs in the film, unlike the book where he tells that he saw a picture of Pettigrew (in rat form) in the newspaper. At a prevent of the book when dwelling school on the Hogwarts Express Ron recieves Pig his hooter. He doesn't recieve a bird of night at a prevent of the moving picture.

Darker tone
A Prisoner of Azkaban gives a Harry Potter saga a great deal darker tone than the last film. This vary is widely attributed to Alfonso Cuarón, though it must exist as noted a source lesson was likewise darker than its predecessors, though non quite to the extreme of the film. A tone of the third film is actually nigher to it of Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix than the book in which it was depending. There is a besides greater degree of physical darkness in the third film than in the 1st 2.

All the Harry Potter books contain scenes on to a mystery/adventure aspect of the stories along using emotional scenes designed to choose the characters. the forevirtually all both films experienced the tendency to focus principally on the mystery/adventure aspect, allowing retired most of the emotional scenes, which inevitably bred criticisms of a deficiency of character development & related issues.

In a third film, the paradigm was reversed sustaining further emphasis in Harry's angst than on the plot. This, also, created the turbulent plotline (view "murky" plotting below,) but most film critics and many fans were pleased with these changes, believing it made the film stronger and the characters more interesting and believable. Others, even so, thought a total of plot points never fully explained was only inexcusable.

Common criticisms
Although a darker tone of Harry Potter & a Prisoner of Azkaban was applauded by fans & critics similar, there were ii (whenever a single doesn't count a disceptation all over a darker tone) major criticisms several fans own of the film.

Continuity issues
Harry Potter & a Prisoner of Azkaban contradicts a last films inside many ways, including a landscaping & layout of Hogwarts. Despite a fact a Harry Potter films are non considered canon, many fans detected a deficiency of continuity wearisome. These contradictions include:

In a foremost 2 films, Hagrid's hut occurs as short few feet away from either a castle, however in the third film these are tremendously farther away. within a number 1 2 films there is no mountains surround Hogwarts, however in Harry Potter & a Prisoner of Azkaban Hogwarts is featured within an enclosed mountainous vale, which is nigher to the actual description in the books. The students at Hogwarts, world health organization put on robes for virtually all of the period in the number 1 2 films, tend to have on normal "Muggle" clothing much further typically, ordinarily just appearing in their robes when you took classes. In a number one both films, a Fatten Lady's portrait was at a prevent of an extended hall, however in the third film it's moved to a room sustaining the moving step. Hagrid's hut is big than in the foremost 2 films & has the pumpkin patch upright outside it. The hospital wing is moved to the top the clocktower, by having the watch of the clock's face upright beyond a doors. In a 1st both films, just the blank wall is seeable beyond the doors.

"Murky" plotting
the more condition typically cited is that a actual development of the plot line appears to develop changed deeply, creating a plotline Roger Ebert described as "a little murky" in his largely caring print view. Within counterpoint to the smooth & elaborate rendition of the former films & of the book, Harry Potter & a Prisoner of Azkaban features the hasty & disconnected succession of typically unconnected cases. Entire patches of a original plot own been either left out or even significantly altered, otherwise from either the conscientious adherence of the previous flick thereto. This is primarily due to the necessity of reducing the brobdingnagian & ever-growing quantity of information around the comparatively short length of instance. Plain, the worry is that viewers world health organizatiin experienced non review a book would exist as at a loss to see what is running on.